The process involved in these models clearly defines the steps of the software development life cycle. Every step in the development life cycle gives rise to the end-product needed by the next stage in the cycle.
Layout design for the product is made from the gathered requirements. The design determines the codes to be written. This step is the development phase. The testing confirms the resulting product from the development stage, and checks to see if it meets the requirements. In the software development service, six basic steps define the process of software development. They are:. In software development , requirements for the products to be designed are sourced in this step.
For most projects, this step happens to be the primary focus. Project managers, interested stakeholders gather around to meet and put together the requirements. Utilization of the product, what kind of data goes into the product? And what kind of data is returned by the product as output?
After the requirements have been gathered, and questions like above have been answered, analysis of the conditions comes next. Clarify desired processing Double — check feasibility of implementing the program Document the analysis kopp. Programs use algorithms which are like equations that tell the computer what task to perform. The aim of the programmer is to create algorithms that are clear and simple. Algorithms are expressed first in logical hierarchical form known as modularzation.
Using modules or a complete thought the programmer creates a logical thought process for the computer to follow. After that the program is broken down in greater detail using pseudocode. Pseudocode uses terms like if, else, and, then to relate the programs rules to the computer.
A module, a processing step of a program, made up of logically related program statements. A hierarchy chart, which represents top-down program design, explains the main purpose of the program.
Pseudocode, a way of designing a program which uses normal language statements in order to describe the logic and the processing flow. After the program has been designed it must be coded or written. Using the pseudocode and logic requirements from step two an appropriate programming language must be selected. As stated in the introduction, coding languages differ in specifications and usability. Once the appropriate code language has been chosen, it is imperative that the programmer follow the syntax rules with as little deviation as possible in order for the program to have high accuraccy.
Select the appropriate high-level programming language Code the program in that language following the syntax carefully. During this time the programmer will be looking for errors in both logic and syntax, as well as exploring other areas that may cause the program to either not work properly or to not run at all. However, with a careful eye paid to program design and coding the amount of time spent debugging can be cut considerably.
Hold public meetings audience: decision-makers, public. Hold press conference audience: media, decision-makers, public. Write editorial letter audience: all. Create housing information section on website audience: consumers, families and staff.
Weekly social media posts. Create housing news section in e-newsletter, etc. Identify Your Spokesperson s : People identify with passionate, knowledgeable people.
WHO leads the community outreach program is another key to its success. Develop Tools or Measures to Assess Progress: The evaluation of your community education program is the primary tool for deciding next steps.
Measures may vary. The larger and more complex the issue, the longer it may take to see progress. Define your measureable outcomes before implementation. At the Intermediate Level Phase, program developers need to assess whether the proposed program involves mandatory or voluntary regulatory requirements and must identify the names of regulatory bodies in Appendix D. It is then possible to begin working towards completing the form and obtaining supporting documentation required for Final Level approval.
The Curriculum Administrator may be contacted for guidance, if the distinction between mandatory and voluntary is unclear. This documentation is forwarded to CVS along with supporting documentation i. Furthermore, the revised MTCU Request for Approval for Funding Form specifically stipulates that: The program content and delivery is and will be compliant with all requirements of regulatory bodies responsible for the field of study or other regulatory bodies related to the field of study.
Please list all applicable mandatory and those voluntary regulatory bodies considered relevant to the program. Submissions require the completion of the appropriate template selected under the Templates and Forms link.
These checklists are available under the Supporting Resources link. Program developers must have their proposal reviewed by their assigned curriculum consultant and incorporate feedback and guidance, as appropriate, into the document prior to presenting the proposal to PRC. Once consultation with the curriculum consultant confirms readiness to proceed to an Intermediate Level PRC presentation, the appropriate template with the required components completed is to be submitted to the Executive Assistant to the Senior Vice President Academic, a minimum of one-week prior to the scheduled PRC meeting date on which the proposal will be presented.
The PRC Meeting Schedule should be reviewed well ahead of time to determine the preferred date to bring the proposal forward for an Intermediate Level review. The curriculum consultant guides developers in completing the template and in preparing for an Intermediate Level presentation. Prior to the meeting PRC members receive the program proposal and prepare comments and questions. The presentation to PRC requires that the chair and program developers provide a high level overview of the development undertaken to date in approximately minutes.
Following the presentation, PRC members have an opportunity to ask questions or seek clarification throughout a systematic review of the proposal submission, which typically takes an additional 15 minutes, depending on the complexity of the proposal.
During the presentation for Intermediate Approval, program developers can generally expect to receive direction on:. At the conclusion of an Intermediate Level presentation, and following Committee questions, the PRC Chair will ask the Committee for a recommendation for approval at the level deemed appropriate based on the presentation and status of the program proposal development.
Typically, the approval sought is at the Intermediate Level, unless during the presentation it is identified that required elements for Intermediate Level approval are not sufficiently developed.
Alternatively, in exceptional circumstances, the program developers may have advanced the proposal beyond the Intermediate Level requirements, to justify consideration for Final Level approval. Feedback to the program developers and identified action items are intended to be constructive and must be incorporated in the final proposal in order to expedite program approval.
The PRC scrutiny ensures that program proposals present professionally and include all necessary components that conform to College, CVS and Ministry requirements. Program proposal developers benefit from the individual expertise of PRC members and the many sets of eyes reviewing the proposal. Throughout the program proposal development and approval processes, program delivery expectations and associated planning must remain at the forefront. This planning is necessary to ensure that the program delivery will not lead to unforeseen facility or resource needs.
Likewise, program delivery scheduling must be well planned. If an online program is being proposed with a residency component, a planning exercise must be undertaken that outlines the full delivery schedule including residency periods. Any residency or non-traditional delivery requirements need to be clearly articulated in program publications.
Formal applicant and employment demand analyses are required for all Ontario college credential programs. Results of the labour market and applicant demand analyses are included in the final program proposal within Template 1, or where otherwise indicated, if applicable, in other templates. There may be other information from the report that is also important to highlight.
Another option is to append the entire report to the proposal. For all Ontario college credential programs there are specific requirements related to the advisory committee that must be included in a Final Level program proposal. For College certificates these are desirable though not essential. The requirements are noted within Section 2. These steps in the program development process should be initiated as soon as possible after Intermediate Level PRC approval. They should occur concurrently with final program proposal development and be reflected within the submission and where indicated, if applicable, within other templates.
The space requirements for the proposed program will be reviewed in detail in order to:. Consideration must be given to any instructional or infrastructure technology requirements. If the program is intending to use mobile learning strategies, these must be identified.
Similarly, any specialized software requirements must be noted. A discussion with a College librarian is to take place to identify start-up and possible resource material requirements.
These are to be noted within Template 1 for all college programs and where indicated, if applicable, within other templates. In addition, the statement should be appended to the proposal. Submissions require the completion of the appropriate template selected under the Key Documents — Templates and Forms link.
These checklists are available under the Program Development — Supporting Resources link.
0コメント